Edition
Real News Antigua & Barbuda

Senator Ashworth Azille Flags "Bifurcated System" in Banking Bill Calling for Equal 10-Year Rule on Safe Deposit Boxes

Editorial Staff
Editorial StaffReal News Editorial Team
4 min read
ShareXFacebookWhatsApp
ashworth azille talking in parliament

Opposition Senator Ashworth Azille lent qualified support to the Banking (Amendment) Bill, 2026 during Thursday's sitting of the Senate, welcoming its tighter regime for abandoned property held in commercial banks while sounding a sharp warning against any notion of channeling dormant depositors' funds into a new regional airline.

Senator Azille told the chamber that no legislation arrives perfect, pushing back on the Leader of Government Business's habit of prefacing bills as "non-contentious." Every debate, he said, is an opportunity to show how a bill "can in fact be improved and bettered in the interests of Antigua and Barbuda."

Ending a "subsidy" for commercial banks

On its face, Senator Azille said, the bill offers a far more comprehensive framework for abandoned property. He endorsed the reduction — from 15 years to 10 — of the period commercial banks may hold unclaimed funds before transferring them to the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank (ECCB), arguing the old arrangement amounted to "a subsidy of sorts" that propped up banks' asset bases with money that was never theirs.

Ten years, he suggested, strikes a healthy balance: more aggressive jurisdictions require handover within three to five years, but a decade gives owners and their estates adequate time to come forward. He also praised the bill's emphasis on notification, noting that many dormant accounts were opened 25 or 30 years ago by people who emigrated, or by family members who never told relatives of their existence. "A comprehensive and very aggressive notification process" is essential, he said, "so that there is no alienation of that particular asset."

A "bifurcated system" for safe deposit boxes

Senator Azille's principal structural criticism targeted what he called a bifurcated system: bank accounts are deemed abandoned after 10 years, but the contents of safe deposit boxes after only five years from the expiration of the lease.

Those boxes, he reminded the House, may hold title deeds, insurance policies, bills and family heirlooms — "many of which are really priceless and irreplaceable." Worse, he argued, the five-year trigger takes no account of whether the leaseholder remains actively engaged with the bank on other business. He urged a uniform 10-year standard across accounts and boxes "to create a sense of equity across both systems," lamenting that in practice the senate behaves as though bills cannot be amended once they arrive.

He also pressed the Leader of Government Business to confirm, in her wrap-up, whether the Abandoned Safe Deposit Box Liquidation Fund — established under the principal 2015 act and referenced in section 173(1) — has actually been created, and what concrete arrangements exist for its administration once the new act commences.


Advertisement

Article mid


"Not the government's right to have the thing and use the thing"

The senator's strongest intervention concerned section 174B, under which funds vested in the crown are held in a special reserve fund for "strategic economic development initiatives approved by the Monetary Council " — language he called vague enough to lend itself "to any and everything."

He recalled the Prime Minister suggesting on radio that some US$50 million in presumably abandoned funds sits in regional banks and could be invested — including, specifically, in a dedicated OECS sub-regional carrier.

"I cringed. I really cringed at that suggestion," Senator Azille said. "These funds remain the property of individuals, and I don't think that it is the government's right to simply have the thing and use the thing where and how they may deem necessary."

Pointing to best practice in jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom — where owners and their estates can reclaim funds in perpetuity, even after vesting. The senator warned against repeating the fate of LIAT (1974) Ltd. "I would imagine that we would have learned our lesson from the history of LIAT 1974 Limited and the demise that it experienced," he said, urging regional leaders to give the airline suggestion "absolutely no consideration."

If vested funds are to be deployed at all, Senator Azille argued, they should go to "real and tangible developmental projects" — he pointed immediately to healthcare and education infrastructure — rather than being "dumped into that black hole." Governments, he observed, often float such ideas publicly "to see whether or not there is public appetite" — which is precisely why the suggestion deserved a response now.

With that, Senator Azille thanked the chamber and yielded the floor.

Comments

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated before appearing.

Weekly Digest

Stay ahead of every story that matters.

Every Monday morning — the week's most important news from Antigua & Barbuda and the Caribbean, delivered straight to your inbox.

  • Breaking news & top stories
  • Politics, crime, business & sport
  • Free — unsubscribe any time

No spam. One email per week. Unsubscribe any time.

or
Join our WhatsApp group

About the author

Editorial Staff
Editorial Staff

Real News Editorial Team

Real News Antigua and Barbuda editorial team.

Advertisement

Leaderboard ad

Related articles

Advertisement

M Banner
Join our WhatsApp